loader image

As sustainability reporting becomes mainstream, organizations are under growing pressure to collect, analyze, and disclose sustainability and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) data in many jurisdictions. Yet, misconceptions persist—making the journey to reliable, decision-ready sustainability data more complex than it needs to be.

Let’s debunk some of the most common myths.

Many believe sustainability data is just about carbon emissions, energy, or waste, in effect they focus only on environmental metrics.

Reality: CSRD, EU Taxonomy, and other frameworks require holistic sustainability data—covering social factors (diversity, human rights, workforce), governance practices, and beyond.

Waiting for 100% accuracy delays progress.

Reality: Regulators and stakeholders value transparency over perfection. Start with available data, disclose assumptions, and improve systems over time.

Some companies treat sustainabilty reporting as a box to tick.

Reality: High-quality data drives strategic insights—helping reduce costs, manage risks, attract investors, and unlock innovation opportunities.

Isolated teams can’t carry the burden alone.

Reality: Sustainability data is cross-functional—spanning finance, HR, operations, supply chain, and IT. Integration is key to credibility and assurance.

Tools are important, but not a silver bullet.

Reality: AI, digital twins, and platforms enable efficiency—but human judgment, stakeholder input, and governance remain essential to ensure meaningful data.

Sustainability data is not only about compliance—it forms the backbone of strategic decision-making in a rapidly changing world. By moving past these myths, organizations can unlock the full potential of sustainability insights to build resilience, trust, and long-term value.